Legacy talk:Brickwall: Difference between revisions
m (Reply, resolving issues) |
(reply, (Issue not resolved ... yet)) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
gate: 175 | gate: 175 | ||
corners: 200 | corners: 200 | ||
IPC: 250 | IPC: 250 (Additional Initial Counterpost construction cost.) | ||
100+175+200+250=725 | 100+175+200+250=725 | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Also your example is warped terribly. It's 300 bricks for the ICP, and it's created acting as if we create 2 cornerposts for the gate, when the formula made was for one of the gate's CPs to be a corner.<br/> | Also your example is warped terribly. It's 300 bricks for the ICP, and it's created acting as if we create 2 cornerposts for the gate, when the formula made was for one of the gate's CPs to be a corner.<br/> | ||
--[[User:ApocalypsePlease|ApocalypsePlease]] 11:52, 25 March 2012 (EDT) | --[[User:ApocalypsePlease|ApocalypsePlease]] 11:52, 25 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
Seems a important part of the IPC var I used got ditched in the copy and past. But it needs to be seen as the 'Additional" cost over the general Conterpost cost. So it can be used as seperate math item. (Ergo: I split the ICP into a AIPC and CP part, Just kept calling it ICP. That's all). (I'm not convinced. Where it the error in my math?) --[[User:MvGulik|MvGulik]] 12:11, 25 March 2012 (EDT) |
Revision as of 16:11, 25 March 2012
Brick wall Calculation
Rook. Your sure about that 465+20*(x+y)?
Hoped I did not have to look into this (As I generally suck at math). But I also end up with 505+20*(x+y).
--MvGulik 11:35, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
(minimal wall design.) *-*--*-* [295] (50*2:CP-corners)+(50*2:CP-gate)+(75:gate)+(10*2:wall) = (50*2)+(50*2)+(75)+(10*2) = 100+100+75+20 = 295 | | [_20] (10*2:wall) = 20 *------* [160] (50*2:CP-corners)+(10*6:wall) = 100+60 = 160 +[250] ICP =[725] (295+20+160+250=725) walls: 6+2+2=10,10*10=100 gate: 175 corners: 200 IPC: 250 (Additional Initial Counterpost construction cost.) 100+175+200+250=725 Base CP cost - +250 ICP - 200 Corners(only). - 175 gate(total). (625) (250+200+175=625) with 8+3: (22=11*2) - 220 (10*22) - -40 Double wall counts. (for each corner(10*4)) = 180 - -80 Double wall/CP counts. (for each corner(10*4) + Gate setup(10*4:2CP+Gate=2) = 40+40 = 80 = 100 (725)=(625+100) (8+3)*20-120+625=725 625-120=505 (8+3)*20+505=725
Rook is right.
Each corner is counted twice since of them being counted in both the x and y, so it's -20 for each corner (then -30 between the gate and fifth cornerpost), totalling a subtraction of 110 from 575.
Also your example is warped terribly. It's 300 bricks for the ICP, and it's created acting as if we create 2 cornerposts for the gate, when the formula made was for one of the gate's CPs to be a corner.
--ApocalypsePlease 11:52, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
Seems a important part of the IPC var I used got ditched in the copy and past. But it needs to be seen as the 'Additional" cost over the general Conterpost cost. So it can be used as seperate math item. (Ergo: I split the ICP into a AIPC and CP part, Just kept calling it ICP. That's all). (I'm not convinced. Where it the error in my math?) --MvGulik 12:11, 25 March 2012 (EDT)