Legacy talk:Foraging: Difference between revisions
m (fixed a math error in spot prob, prob<=1) |
m (and now i realize that i was to picky and just f'd it up, but p(something) should be between 0 and 1 not written in percent) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::range/100 = 15 | ::range/100 = 15 | ||
::So at level 500, you see 1% of rustroots. Each 15 PER * EXP you gain awards you an additional 1% chance up to 100%. | ::So at level 500, you see 1% of rustroots. Each 15 PER * EXP you gain awards you an additional 1% chance up to 100%. | ||
::Something like: <math>\operatorname{p}(spotting){{=}}\operatorname{floor}({lev - min\over gradiation}+1 | ::Something like: <math>\operatorname{p}(spotting){{=}}\operatorname{floor}({lev - min\over gradiation})+1 </math>% | ||
::Where ''lev'' is the player's <math>PER \times EXP</math>, ''min'' is the forageable's <math>base \over 2</math>, ''range'' is the forageable's <math>(base \times 2) - ({base \over 2})</math> and ''gradiation'' is <math>range \over 100</math> | ::Where ''lev'' is the player's <math>PER \times EXP</math>, ''min'' is the forageable's <math>base \over 2</math>, ''range'' is the forageable's <math>(base \times 2) - ({base \over 2})</math> and ''gradiation'' is <math>range \over 100</math> | ||
:: --[[User:SubmittedDenied|SubmittedDenied]] 00:50, 12 October 2011 (CDT) | :: --[[User:SubmittedDenied|SubmittedDenied]] 00:50, 12 October 2011 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:06, 12 October 2011
Ant Hills: It appears they can no longer be raided without hunting. Can someone confirm this?
clarify please
The article says:
- There is a base value to start spotting foragable goods. Higher stats will increase the spotting chance, until reaching 4 times the base value.
Can anyone clarify the second sentence? Does it mean that the probability to spot is increased 4 times, or that there's no point leveling PER*EXP further than 4 times the base value?
On the spot probability
Suppose a herb is growing near your house. Each time you exit the house you spot that herb with a certain chance (dependant on your per*exp). So if you enter-exit the house many times (say, 100), and count how many times did you see that plant, you can get an approximation to the real spot chance. Maybe, when we have enough data, we can get the formula how is that chance calculated.
So, at 725 per*exp (25*29) have spotted Tangled Bramble 78/100 times. And at 18*29 =522 per*exp (without spectacles), only 40/100.
Earlier I've experimented with candleberry and with per*exp=297 (11*27) spotted it 15/50 times.
Any ideas about the formula?
Theodor 20:26, 26 March 2011 (CDT)
- Okay, it seems that there's a thereshold per*exp value to start seeing a herb and every 5 per*exp above that increase the chance of finding it by 1%. If this is true, then Tangled Bramble minimal per*exp would be ~320 and candleberry's - around 150. The wiki states that the lowest reported per*exp to spot these herbs are 351 and 160 respectively which are very close! Theodor 20:35, 26 March 2011 (CDT)
- Disregard that, most probably I was wrong from the start. Quoting Jorb: "Rustroot's base level is 1000. Which means you'll start seeing them at 500 and see all of them at 2000."
- You could still be right, if they're first seen at level/2 and all are seen at 2 * level, the formula could just define 100 levels of gradiation between those two values and add 1% chance for each level. Eg for rustroot:
- Min = 500, Max = 2000, range = 1500
- range/100 = 15
- So at level 500, you see 1% of rustroots. Each 15 PER * EXP you gain awards you an additional 1% chance up to 100%.
- Something like: %
- Where lev is the player's , min is the forageable's , range is the forageable's and gradiation is
- --SubmittedDenied 00:50, 12 October 2011 (CDT)
WWW
Just as an attempt at clarifying when WWWs show up, I was stuck at 88 per*exp for a fair while and saw none. Doesn't mean much. However I did get one at 99, so they are definitely available under 100.