Talk:Tri Quality System: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Obsolete with World 10 | Obsolete with World 10 | ||
https://www.havenandhearth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=52822&sid=f07116ff4b71ac9f38d635111bb46127#p700991 | |||
#Quality | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 06:30, 29 January 2017
Obsolete with World 10 https://www.havenandhearth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=52822&sid=f07116ff4b71ac9f38d635111bb46127#p700991
- Quality
Rawrz ┊ the 3 qualities make things confusing as hell, i still dont know what essence does on sword ... loftar ┊ Essence on weapons generally increase your effective agility.
--Marisa (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2015 (EST)
Regarding Weapon Damage
The damage formula for swords (I'm about 90% sure of this) is the old damage formula, except replacing the quality with the new average quality formula.
It would look something like this:
However there may be some truncation somewhere, or the formula is slightly different than this.
This would approximate the Hirdsman's Sword having a base damage of 130.
--ApocalypsePlease (talk) 15:09, 16 October 2015 (EDT)
- are you sure it's not just using substance instead of average quality?
- bow damage seems to rely only on sub (not 100% on that), and there is a lot of talk on the forums about sub being most important for weapons. --Turtlesir (talk) 18:42, 16 October 2015 (EDT)
- That could be the case, it is giving more consistent numbers. The modifier should then be . I will look into this more and try to get more data points to confirm --ApocalypsePlease (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2015 (EDT)
Page location
Shouldn't this be on the "Quality" page instead of a redirect? After all, the tooltip in the game says "Quality," and it's what most people are going to look for when coming here. --MagicManICT (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2015 (EST)
- I tend to agree that this should be the "Quality" page, however the old quality page should be moved to the legacy namespace first. I will do this action when I am confident in the bow formulas. --ApocalypsePlease (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2015 (EST)