Talk:Tri Quality System: Difference between revisions

From Ring of Brodgar
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
----
----


      Rawrz ┊ the 3 qualities make things confusing as hell, i still dont know what essence does on sword
----
 
    Rawrz ┊ the 3 qualities make things confusing as hell, i still dont know what essence does on sword
       ...
       ...
     loftar ┊ Essence on weapons generally increase your effective agility.
     loftar ┊ Essence on weapons generally increase your effective agility.

Revision as of 06:32, 29 January 2017

Obsolete with World 10

https://www.havenandhearth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=52822&sid=f07116ff4b71ac9f38d635111bb46127#p700991 > #Quality




    Rawrz ┊ the 3 qualities make things confusing as hell, i still dont know what essence does on sword
     ...
    loftar ┊ Essence on weapons generally increase your effective agility.

--Marisa (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2015 (EST)

Regarding Weapon Damage

The damage formula for swords (I'm about 90% sure of this) is the old damage formula, except replacing the quality with the new average quality formula.

It would look something like this:

However there may be some truncation somewhere, or the formula is slightly different than this.

This would approximate the Hirdsman's Sword having a base damage of 130.

--ApocalypsePlease (talk) 15:09, 16 October 2015 (EDT)

are you sure it's not just using substance instead of average quality?
bow damage seems to rely only on sub (not 100% on that), and there is a lot of talk on the forums about sub being most important for weapons. --Turtlesir (talk) 18:42, 16 October 2015 (EDT)
That could be the case, it is giving more consistent numbers. The modifier should then be . I will look into this more and try to get more data points to confirm --ApocalypsePlease (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2015 (EDT)

Page location

Shouldn't this be on the "Quality" page instead of a redirect? After all, the tooltip in the game says "Quality," and it's what most people are going to look for when coming here. --MagicManICT (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2015 (EST)

I tend to agree that this should be the "Quality" page, however the old quality page should be moved to the legacy namespace first. I will do this action when I am confident in the bow formulas. --ApocalypsePlease (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2015 (EST)