Legacy talk:Willow Tree

Stuff that doesn't make sense for specific object can be dropped (like sthp for a tree) and, personaly, i think it actualy makes infobox neater to drop it.
On the other hand if you feel it makes sense to include it then i won't question it. --Rook (21 March 2012)

Didn't give it much though to be honest. Was pasting those two as single data block. I don't mind not seeing them on the tree displayed pages. But the problem is then that it seems like there not known (as there is no data line in the infobox about it). The soak makes no sens for a tree (removed). But the hitpoints are a property with some value (not that useful to most I imagine, but its still data.) --MvGulik 16:16, 21 March 2012 (EDT)

Again, all this is my personal, subjective fealing. I absolutely agree with posting "placeholder" info on subjects that matter, even if in small way, to differentiate between "not known" and "not applicable", but specificaly for tree has anyone ever tried to ram/bash it? Is there any reason to try that(appart from proving me wrong)? Otherwise all one would use is choping, which gives you progress indication rather than hp. Also, there's a matter of interpretation, if i see a -999 somewhere i think the actual data exists but is unknown, on the other hand if i see nothing i think nothing relevant is missing. --Rook 17:42, 21 March 2012 (EDT)

I see your points. (seems my previous, also short, replay did not make it.) --MvGulik (21 March 2012)