User talk:Csatangollah

>"removed extra text, maybe it was interfering (according to ai it did)" ref Do you have the AI report on that for me. Might help in clearing up what the issue was/is.

>"skill tree header is no longer covered with toc" ref Sorry to say TOC still covering the image. At least for Firefox 146.0 (Linux). (also showing some SMW output junk. ...)

Also ... Please try to use sandbox(/..) page(s) for testing and intermediated problem solving, instead of the actual main target page. (most of the time the preview works just as well as saving. Which of course is considered a non issue on sandbox pages..)

--.MvGulik. 09:54, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

After searching around a bit I'm kinda doubtful RoB-wiki has the needed features to create functional image-maps. I could potentially help if you have, or know, a basic proof of concept I can check out. --.MvGulik. 16:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

answer to MvGulik

so i mentioned the ai that the record is grouping the last three fields of the record, and the ai was thinking that the first field must have thrown out of the record - even though i was mentioning him that all 60 pages are present for each field as used by.

in the end, i argued to ai so much, i just opened a new instance of him, and the new insance told me to use explicit calls with property chains

the purpose for toc is to cover the image when it is expanded. i am not sure if you can not collapse it with firefox, however that is using the toc-collapsible class that i did not write myself, it is stock

i have never tried sandbox pages, thank you for suggesting, i will look up how can i proceed with those

yes the wiki does not need the functionality of image maps - that is the exact reason i am not requesting it, but just doing it myself

the proof of concept is present already - however i need help with making the divs background transparent in front of the png, or to make those be pushed below the png z while still working as links. if the divs do not work for links - such as because the link part of it is too tiny, then i will need to look for a different container

>"record is grouping the last three fields of the record" That is a general, and kinda annoying, SMW output behavior. output: r1,(r2,r3,...).

>"the purpose for toc is to cover the image" Yea, I get that now.

>"sandbox pages" There is nothing special about them other then the name. In essence the name shows other users its a, usually temporary, test case. One reason for them if of course to limit WIP effects in Main-subject pages, and to keep out a slew of unnecessary testing-edits in there history.

Seems you got it working. It will take me some time to explore & learn from it. (The ImageMap MW extension might be easier in use, but I had. still have, doubts if it would be activated for RoB-wiki if requested. So I don't.) --.MvGulik. 10:39, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

answer to MvGulik on

i do own an svg version of the png, i do not know the extension capability of this wiki, so i require help with it too. i am not sure whether an interactive skill tree would be more simple using the svg instead of the png.

also given that i have uploaded the png with the plantuml source i have created it, any user can also create the svg version (both jebbs plantuml extension, and visual studio code are free), upload it, and use it as interactive skill tree provided any extensions are present, or not in the future if required

further on help i need. currently i can not make the div that holds onto both the markers, and the image to be constrictive of the height. i do not know why. i am trying to set a max height, a height in pixels, but the y-overflow is way too much higher than it is required - currently i constricted it with defining the overflow-x to be auto, and then i hid overflow-y

>"svg" SVG support is very basic (no scripting). The main SVG issue is that the auto-resized versions 'can' become useless on RoB-wiki. resized vs Original

answer to MvGulik on

so i feel like i have managed to overcome some of the difficulties. if you have got any suggestions, just tell me, or don't even tell me just do it yourself. do not wait me for an eternity even if you know your suggestions are worthy, just do it yourself

Don't worry. If I see some need for adjustments I will not hesitate to do them. But first, based on past RoB-wiki user history, I liked to see what kind of user I might be dealing with. --.MvGulik. 10:39, 27 December 2025 (UTC)