User talk:LordMark

@MvGulik: I don't know if you're ever going to see this, but you've given me no other place to speak(which was a far worse move than anything Drump has ever done, at least he lets his opponents rebuttal in a debate -- can't believe I'm sticking up for that asshat, but there you go) but the majority consensus from what I can tell is that the wiki is fairly outdated. I just now discovered that Sewing requires Farming (by unlocking it), which I had assumed was the requirement before choosing it. I don't care that you think my screenshot was doctored or not, but you're clearly no professional in the matter so it wouldn't make a difference if it was. Instead of waiting for someone to get back to you why didn't you simply test it out yourself? It really doesn't take long to create a new character and purchase a couple cheap skills. Either way, blocking me from doing anything was a bad move on your part and I hope some due justice is in your near future.
--user:LordMark(6 October 2018‎)

I'd say MvGulik was right - but your punishment was a little too harsh for me, good job at finding real requirement for a skill, just don't force us to test something - bcs you can do it easy by yourself, then edit ;). And btw your post was looks like troll pretty much, no offense - just a notice. --Kitsuneg (talk) 6 October 2018 (EDT)

(LordMark)>Instead of waiting for someone to get back to you why didn't you simply test it out yourself?

Because I don't have the game installed, as I have no interest (or the time) in playing it.

(Kitsuneg)>punishment

Its more a just in case save-garde.

Figure LordMark is for real, although a bit emotional and immature.

Block lifted.

--.MvGulik. 14:48, 6 October 2018 (EDT)

I knew this is how he would respond; I was not overreacting, though I admit it can appear that way. If the shoe was on the other foot I wonder what the result would have been. Oh wait, I wouldn't have accused him of anything without evidence. The reason I responded this way was only because if someone is trying to help the wiki improve there should be no reason for this kind of attacks. The talk page of any wiki site is for friendly discussion, and I understand that if someone is filling it with spam(for whatever reason) there should be action taken against it(but not necessarily the user, at least not on first offense), but to make such a claim you must understand the subject. It is clear that he does not, as he admits he does not play the game and has no interest in it. What right does he have to be involved in it then? Anyway, I just hope that this sort of thing doesn't happen regularly to other users who are only trying to help. I guess if we lived in a perfect world there would be no need for wikis in the first place. --user:LordMark(7 October 2018‎)

PS: Its customary to sign your talks on a wiki. If nobody would do that it would become unnecessary hard to follow who said what. --.MvGulik. 01:44, 7 October 2018 (EDT)