User talk:Ricky

Interesting and useful pages:
http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/User:MvGulik/tooltips_dump

Need a template? check out this page.
http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/Template:Infobox_metaobj

Hello! For attacks and restorations on Combat moves what order should the columns go in?
Restoration I was thinking Name-Cost-Reduces-opens-cooldown-notes-wieght-learned from
For Attacks I was thinking Name-Cost-opens-attack type-damage-grievous damage-cooldown-notes learned from.
Is this ok?--Pinkie-Pie (talk) 16:50, 16 August 2017 (EDT)

Old messages

Ricky can you add me on h&h forum, i have some qustions about properities and templates. My nickname are same "rootconsoler" --Rootconsoler (talk) 10:31, 3 March 2017 (EST) Hey, re: Symbel being deleted, can we get the table that used to be there re-added to the top of Category:The_Symbel perhaps? I used that all the time and it being gone is pretty annoying. Ideally this would be automatic, but we do already do it in some other places (see Category:Baked_Goods and others). Way more handy than opening up dozens of tabs. Twincannon (talk) 11:14, 3 February 2017 (EST) Hey, sorry about that. I added the table back to category:the Symbel --Ricky (talk) 13:21, 3 February 2017 (EST) Those tree pages not redundant.- As jummy told they are used for redirect pages. But i think, every ingame item must have their own page. All links to tables must be added to item page, same for tables. --Rootconsoler (talk) 12:23, 1 March 2017 (EST) Why do we have separate pages for different trees, when all the information is neatly organized on Tree? It seems redundant, and I think we should just do away with independent tree pages. NotJimmy97 (talk) Yeah, I understand that it feels redundant, but I wanted each tree to have its separate page in order to be able to link specific trees in articles. before I gave each tree its own page, most trees were dead links. While it would be reasonable to have each tree redirect to the tree page, I wanted users to be able to type a tree name into the search bar and actually pull up that tree, instead of a list of ~45 trees. On top of that, certain special trees already had their own page, such as the mulberry tree and apple tree so I felt it would be reasonable to give each trees its own page and its own metabox to add info to it. I should have at least filled in the metabox info for each tree, but that is quite a bit of work. Ideally, each tree page would have a description of block and board textures as well, without having to visit the Block of Wood and Board page I did however change the metabox to link to the tree page in the first sentence of each tree page, so that should at least help users find useful info on the (unfortunately) empty pages --Ricky (talk) 22:06, 22 January 2017 (EST) I think those special trees only had pages during legacy. There's no special information conveyed on the Apple or Mulberry tree pages that isn't already sufficiently described in Tree, Apple Pie, or Silk Cloth. NotJimmy97 (talk) By That logic, we should also remove every food item and curiosity and simply use the tables. Within the next week, I'll go through and actually add information to the individual tree pages, and create a table similar to the FEP/curio tables that can pull info from each tree page which will appear on the infobox table on the main Tree page. --Ricky (talk) 23:38, 22 January 2017 (EST)