Category talk:Armor

Armor absorption text outdated ?

This text is outdated, right? "While moving your armor still provides full absorption but your defense bar is negated." --SignFix: Tammer (talk • contribs) 18:11, 5 May 2018‎ (UTC)

I wish I could tell you ... but I don't know that kind of stuff. Hope some other RoB regular knows. --.MvGulik. 12:28, 6 May 2018 (EDT)

Yes, Armor was recently updated during the Combat Update ( and subsequent revision - armor changes were kept). Beyond that, I couldn't tell you exactly what changes were made. Check out the Fighting Quail Update --SignFix: Ricky (talk • contribs) 00:50, 8 May 2018‎ (UTC)

Table position

) Undoing a undo is not done (only good for triggering undo wars). If you don't agree with a undo, you take it to talk and solve it there. (And as admin I have to block/undo your undo, And something tells me I also better add this one: and hope you don't fore me to also temporarily lock the page)
) https://i.imgur.com/QvdjWuY.png don't looks like a regular screen to me. If you want to make a point with it, a screenshot alone don't really covers that. I figure a lot of paged can be shown in some resized window width to make them look bad.
) Is there anything special about that window width-size? If I lower the window-with a bit more for that page it looks ok again. Just with table at the top, and text below it.
) Do you have any general or standard width in mind as important width to test against?
) Do you think there might be a other solution here? (I do see you got HTML/CSS experience)

--.MvGulik. 14:39, 22 March 2020 (EDT)

Lets draw in some similar cases. No point in not trying to solve this for them too.

Float:Right + left text.
- Category:The_Symbel
- Category:Weapons
Table:Float:Right (but just single-line or no left text).

(Infoboxes ? - "you don't put tables on sides"). --.MvGulik. 15:26, 22 March 2020 (EDT)

The screen has been taken from rotated 1920x1080p monitor, that I use often for programming. If you use chrome web tools(F12), enable device preview(Ctrl+Shft+M), and type in page resolution 1050x1750(side bar, top bar, sys bar excluded), you will have size of the article like on my monitor. It is not uncommon configuration, I always read wikias on that screen as well.

This problem seems to be bad on Category:Armor, Category:Gildable_Equipment, and horrible on Category:Weapons, Category:Gilding_Objects. It's fine on others like Category:Skills.

It can be fixed with CSS if CSS extension is enabled. And solution can work with all tables when included.

   @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) {
       .wikitable {
           float:none;
       }
   }
   @media only screen and (min-width: 600px) {
       .wikitable {
           float:right;
       }
   }

--Ghandhi (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2020 (EDT)

Aha, thanks for background info. I like the @media solution. Not to sure yet if it can be used on RoB, but it looks like its supported. Never played around with the CSS @media feature before so I will need to dig into it a bit more before final implementation. (kinda realize I have become kinda accustomed to my 1600 width) --.MvGulik. 08:16, 23 March 2020 (EDT)

Done. Added collapsible to get rid of table (just in case). --.MvGulik. 14:46, 24 March 2020 (EDT)

Works nicely and stays out of the way, cheers --Ghandhi (talk) 19:12, 24 March 2020 (EDT)

Category talk:Armor

Armor absorption text outdated ?

Table position

Navigation menu

Search